<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Deflated-Sharpe-Ratio on rollbrains</title>
    <link>https://rollbrains.com/tags/deflated-sharpe-ratio/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Deflated-Sharpe-Ratio on rollbrains</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://rollbrains.com/tags/deflated-sharpe-ratio/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Deflated Sharpe Ratio: Why a 2.5 Sharpe Can Still Be Statistical Noise</title>
      <link>https://rollbrains.com/quant/deflated-sharpe-ratio/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rollbrains.com/quant/deflated-sharpe-ratio/</guid>
      <description>A backtest Sharpe of 2.5 can carry a Deflated Sharpe Ratio of just 0.90 — failing the 95% confidence bar — once you correct for how many strategies were tried and how non-Normal the returns are. We walk through the Bailey &amp;amp; López de Prado formula, the worked example, and the code.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
