Prompt-Engineering

💡 TL;DR / Summary - Key Takeaways Pine Script v6 Revolution: Replaces high-latency legacy v5 client-side arrays with the server-side native request.footprint() API, ensuring zero-lag and exact tick-level precision. Premium Plan Requirement: This API is resource-intensive and restricted to Premium and Ultimate plans. Lower-tier plans return na and render a blank chart silently. AI Generation Success: To prevent compiler and runtime failures (RE10047), custom prompts must feed the exact v6 footprint syntax and strictly enforce a single-call constraint. If you could peer inside a single candlestick as it moves up and down in real-time, seeing exactly where buyers and sellers are fighting and at what price levels — how would that change your trading? ...

There’s a common claim that asking Remix one big “master prompt” saves significant usage versus splitting your questions. I tested both approaches with the same Bitcoin analysis on Premium (5×): four split questions consumed 10 tools (1% usage); a single master prompt with broader scope consumed 19 tools (also 1% usage). 💡 TL;DR / Summary - Master Prompt vs. Split Questions: Key Takeaways Myth Debunked: Asking a single master prompt does NOT save quota over split questions. Both burned exactly 1% of Premium weekly usage in our controlled tests. Session Context Subsidy: Chaining questions in the same session is surprisingly efficient. The last synthesis question cost only 2 tools thanks to automatic session context reuse. Strategic Choice: Use Master Prompts when you need a highly cohesive, self-contained report with automatic chart drawings in one shot. Use Split Questions for interactive, stepwise analysis. The 5× savings claim circulating online is exaggerated. But the master prompt does pack 9 more tools of work into the same 1% bucket — it doesn’t save quota, it produces more output per percent. Remix is officially promoted on the TradingView blog and distributed via the Chrome Web Store. ...